Friday, February 12, 2010

Economic Status and the New Testament

When I was in grad school, a coon's age ago, a common wisdom was emerging concerning the economic status of the early Christians. Works by Gerd Theissen and Wayne Meeks indicated mixed communities with a small number of fairly affluent persons, a mix of entrepreneurial tradespersons and merchants, and a substantial number of the truly poor and of slaves. First Corinthians 1:26 said it all: If "not many" of the Corinthians were powerful or of noble birth, then a few must have been.

More recently, however, research by Justin Meggitt and Steven Friesen has painted a picture that's far more grim. The overwhelming majority of ancient people, they argue, were profoundly poor. Relative affluence applied only to the fewest people, Christians included.

All of us tend to cling to the models with which we were "raised," and I'm no exception. But something's long bothered me about the notion that (practically) all the early Christians were desperately poor. First, I must say I've never done an iota of independent research into ancient living conditions. But here are my reservations. For one thing, it seems to me that the argument for nearly universal poverty depends more on models than on empirical evidence. Second, the NT documents are full of calls for almsgiving, stories about banquets, conflict between more and less prosperous believers, and communication between churches over expansive distances. Finally, it seems quite a few ancient people decorated their houses, which suggests some measure of leisure.

A fairly recent multi-author volume by classics scholars is just now making its way down to us NT scholars whose research lies outside ancient economics: Margaret Atkins and Robin Osborne, editors, Poverty in the Roman World (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006). There's also the 2007 Cambridge Economic History of the Greco-Roman World (ed. Walter Schiedel, Ian Morris, Richard P. Saller). These authors largely agree that the Roman economy didn't do all that badly during the first and second centuries CE, and that poverty was not nearly so universal as some would maintain. See Willem M. Jongman's essay on "Consumption" in the Cambridge Economic History. On the other hand, things declined dramatically in the ensuing centuries. Even recent scholarship on economics in early Christianity (it seems to me) hasn't fully engaged this new work. (See Bruce W. Longenecker and Kelly D. Liebengood, eds., Engaging Economics: New Testament Scenarios and Early Christian Reception [Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2009].)

For now, I'll consider this a live conversation. But it has tremendous implications for the interpretation of many NT documents.

17 comments:

Unknown said...

I agree that empirical evidence might suggest less wide spread poverty and more relative “economic” well being. I base at least part of this perspective on the voluminous amounts of coins minted in the Roman world. Carlos Norena notes that “. . . imperial coins were produced on a near-industrial scale and circulated throughout the whole of the Empire . . . and therefore reached the widest possible cross-section of the Empire’s population (“The Communication of the Emperor’s Virtues” The Journal of Roman Studies 91 [2001]). Consider just this simple example during the reign of Vespasian. It has been estimated that 357.6 million denarii (silver coins) were minted during Vespasian's reign which would mean an average of 37.6 million per year (Richard Duncan-Jones, Money and Government in the Roman Empire [Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994], 168). Several some ones have to be getting and using these coins. Add to this number the aurei (gold coins), sestertii (large bronze coins), dupondii (brass-copper coins), quadrantes and asses (small denomination copper coins), and also the prolific provincial coinage minted by large cities currying the favor of Rome and the imperial family, and one gets a better sense of the ubiquitous circulation and influence of coinage in the Roman Empire.

Unknown said...

Thanks for that, David. Very helpful.

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Anonymous said...

What a great resource!

Anonymous said...

Nice dispatch and this enter helped me alot in my college assignement. Thanks you as your information.

Anonymous said...

Hi everybody!

Let me introduce myself,
friends call me Nikolas.
Generally I’m a venturesome gambler. for a long time I’m keen on online-casino and poker.
Not long time ago I started my own blog, where I describe my virtual adventures.
Probably, it will be interesting for you to read my notes.
Please visit my web site. http://allbestcasino.com I’ll be glad would you find time to leave your opinion.

Anonymous said...

Glad to materialize here. Good day or night everybody!

Let me introduce myself,
my parents call me Nikolas.
Generally I’m a social gmabler. for a long time I’m keen on online-casino and poker.
Not long time ago I started my own blog, where I describe my virtual adventures.
Probably, it will be interesting for you to read my travel notes and reports about winnings and losses on this way.
Please visit my blog. http://allbestcasino.com I’ll be glad would you find time to leave your comments.

Anonymous said...

Hi everyone

We do not agree with this year Brit awards decision.

Please come to see our little web poll

http://micropoll.com/t/KDqOnZBCWt

Lady Gaga can not be better than Nina Hagen

Poll supported by BRIT awards 2010 sponsor femmestyle
[url=http://www.femmestyle.ch/schoenheitschirurgie/fettabsaugung/index.html]fettabsaugung[/url]

BRITs.co.uk - tickets left standing!! This Competition is now closed
OK

Anonymous said...

limit in vomit-provoking this gratis [url=http://www.casinoapart.com]casino[/url] perk at the greatest [url=http://www.casinoapart.com]online casino[/url] criterion with 10's of modish [url=http://www.casinoapart.com]online casinos[/url]. actions [url=http://www.casinoapart.com/articles/play-roulette.html]roulette[/url], [url=http://www.casinoapart.com/articles/play-slots.html]slots[/url] and [url=http://www.casinoapart.com/articles/play-baccarat.html]baccarat[/url] at this [url=http://www.casinoapart.com/articles/no-deposit-casinos.html]no ‚clat casino[/url] , www.casinoapart.com
the finest [url=http://de.casinoapart.com]casino[/url] against UK, german and all as a jam the world. so in search the treatment of the cork [url=http://es.casinoapart.com]casino en linea[/url] discontinuity us now.

Solid Rock or Sinking Sand said...

I really enjoyed this post. Thanks for the information. God bless, Lloyd

Anonymous said...

Hey All,

I've been looking to figure out a good place to start with the acai free trial & was wondering if anybody had any thoughts on whether or not it works for weight loss? So far this is the 1 [url=http://acaiberries.zoomblog.com/]article[/url] I've been able to read that seemed real for what my goals are. Thoughts?

Anonymous said...

[url=http://community.momlogic.com/profile/BuyLevitra]Buy Levitra[/url]
Buy Levitra
http://community.momlogic.com/profile/BuyLevitra

Anonymous said...

G點,情趣,情趣用品
潤滑液,內衣,性感內衣,
自慰器,自慰套,情趣內衣,
情趣娃娃,吊帶襪,煙火,
SM,充氣娃娃,AV,
衣蝶,丁字褲,無線跳蛋,
性感睡衣,按摩棒,電動按摩棒,
飛機杯,角色扮演,跳蛋,
情趣用品,情趣

Anonymous said...

A man begins icy his discernment teeth the senior time he bites off more than he can chew.

Anonymous said...

To be a upright lenient being is to be enduring a make of openness to the far-out, an skill to trusteeship unsure things beyond your own control, that can take you to be shattered in very exceptional circumstances on which you were not to blame. That says something exceedingly important about the fettle of the ethical compulsion: that it is based on a trustworthiness in the uncertain and on a willingness to be exposed; it's based on being more like a plant than like a jewel, something kind of fragile, but whose extremely precise attractiveness is inseparable from that fragility.

Anonymous said...

To be a noble charitable being is to have a amiable of openness to the mankind, an skill to trust uncertain things beyond your own restrain, that can take you to be shattered in very exceptionally circumstances on which you were not to blame. That says something very important about the fettle of the honest compulsion: that it is based on a trust in the uncertain and on a willingness to be exposed; it's based on being more like a spy than like a prize, something somewhat tenuous, but whose very particular handsomeness is inseparable from that fragility.

Anonymous said...

I enjoyed reading your blog. Keep it that way.